top of page

Although not my most experienced element of writing, I truly enjoy writing reviews of all things entertainment. Books, authors, films, television shows, music, and so on...

Here is a review of the first book in my current favorite series (also a TV franchise now on STARZ), Cross Stitch / Outlander. This review was particularly enjoyable for me, as I spent a few years in Scotland earning a master's degree in creative writing. Visiting some of the cities and sites referred to in the book made it even more special! Enjoy!

crossstitch.jpg
Diana Gabaldon.jpg
Culloden.jpg
Inverness - Culloden Ryan bench.JPG

Being able to take a moment and reflect at the battlefield of Culloden (multiple times) has been a truly awe-inspiring experience.

​

Review of Cross Stitch (Outlander) by: Diana Gabaldon
Penguin Random House; New Ed edition (January 1, 1994)

 

Editing and Publishing review by: Ryan Lafield

 

As a writer and reader of all genres, the idea of combining historical fiction with the science fiction elements of time and the supernatural has always intrigued me. For starters, bookstores – and, of course, now, E-book directory listings – would be unsure of which genre to place it in. They, in turn, would be forced to be creative themselves. It is a good problem to have in the current state of literature. Diana Gabaldon’s Cross Stitch, the first novel in the ongoing “Outlander” series, qualifies for this dilemma. I had found my hybrid story.

 

Skipping any reviewing build up, Gabaldon’s writing is brilliant. Her character-building, attention to detail, and plotline navigation are first-rate. I have shrugged off reviewing historical fiction in the past (no pun intended), as it requires factual research in addition to creative analysis. However, something prodded me to open this thick hardback, willing to dissect both. I was rewarded with a composition that was a struggle to set down. Bravo, Mrs. Gabaldon, for pulling me into your world.

 

Cross Stitch begins in 1945, Boston, Massachusetts. An English woman, Claire Randall, a combat nurse in World War II, is reunited with her husband Frank, an historian. On a research trip to Scotland, Frank’s curiosity leads them to a circle of large stones in the Highlands, known for witchcraft rituals of the past. After the necessary – but not quite overwhelming “information drop” – introduction to the characters’ lives, Claire passes through the stones, and ultimately through a time vortex, landing in 18th century Scotland. Shocked and alone in 1743, Claire was unknowingly cast into the core of the known Jacobite Rising, headed by Prince Charles Stuart, which pinned the Jacobites (supporters of exiled Stuart King, James II) against those who were loyal to the English King, George II.

 

Gabaldon pieced together a novel that contains a vast array of literary topics – romance, adventure, science fiction – all supported by historical accuracy when necessary. Digging deeper into the author’s background, I discovered that pre-dating her writing career, she was a research scientist, and the focus of much of her early work was, in fact, research-based nonfiction. Her study and mastery of language (Scottish Gaelic, French, and others) and Scottish history as a whole, added to her credibility for the story, as well as her ability to connect fact to fiction within her characterization and setting – a task not easy to accomplish.

 

Upon her arrival, Claire is kidnapped by a clan of Scottish “rebels,” and being a “Sassenach,” or Englishwoman, she is immediately suspected of espionage. As a prisoner, she grows close to one of her captors, Jamie Fraser. Harbored feelings for her husband left behind…or ahead…in the 20th century, lead Claire to eventual internal struggles, as her feelings for Jamie grow.

Although not apparent early on in the story, or even when discovering what the book is about, one of the best romance tales I’ve ever encountered blossoms from within. In the most unlikely of love affairs, Gabaldon has the two characters’ relationship make sense. I would have no difficulty labeling the work as a romance novel, which, amidst the violence, history, and witchcraft, continued to impress.

 

The bulk of the story led me astray from Claire’s most important conundrum – living over two hundred years before her time. Gabaldon’s effective narration and dialogue reminds the reader of that. Would Claire’s knowledge of the past aid in changing the outcome of the catastrophic events surrounding the Jacobite cause, and ultimately, the fall on the battlefield at Culloden?

As a side note, I personally paid a visit to that very battlefield of Culloden, near Inverness, Scotland, while earning a master’s degree in Glasgow. It was one of the first trips I made. Because of a novel. To me, that is powerful writing.

 

Gabaldon is a storyteller, simply put, but with a beautiful and effective curse of also being a research expert. Through her writing, she connects the reader to Jamie Fraser and Claire Randall, and the gradually intensifying relationship between them. Readers will want to fall in love with Jamie, and others will want to emulate him. Readers will want to find someone like Claire in their own lives, while others will strive to be like her. The author’s use of historical detail adds a comfort level, with an impressive display of written accents, primarily ancient Scottish Gaelic – which according to credible sources, was completely accurate in translation. To be introduced to characters from multiple countries throughout the book and to accurately depict accents and tone is quality writing. Reading 18th century Scots screaming at each other in Gaelic was very entertaining as well.

 

The information Claire has of intertwining ancestry, knowledge of medical issues (albeit with a lack of modern medicinal aids), and the known failure of the rebellion, she is constantly torn on how, if at all, to intervene. In addition, she is living in a time where any of these revelations – even in the slightest – would brand her a witch to many. Claire is forced to navigate through those obstacles to survive, and to protect Jamie from the future. Likewise, in the mid 1700’s, women were treated quite differently than what we know. The strong-willed former WWII nurse was not fond of that practice, and stunned those who surrounded her with “rebellious” demeanor towards men – particularly when Jamie attempted to spank her for bad behavior. 

 

All of the societal issues Claire faced in the 18th century also allowed Gabaldon to explore current subjects from our modern-day society. In a culture now focused on women’s rights, vaccinated children, and better education, the author is able to teach the reader. To guide the reader. To remind the reader that social and political topics have existed on many levels throughout time, and that attaining that insight is crucial for continued advancement in humanity.

 

I found myself welcoming anger, laughter, frustration, sadness, as well as any other emotion that came my way, as a package deal. Gabaldon seemed to have a goal of strapping the readers onto her emotional roller coaster and not letting them exit until she thought it was time. Upon completion of the novel, I ventured to the bookstore for the next book in the “Outlander” series – Dragonfly in Amber.

​

I suppose that is all one needs to know about Cross Stitch.

​

Below is an analysis I did for my favorite genre of fiction writing: science fiction/speculative fiction. Many of my favorite authors are listed within, however, the focus of the essay is to assess Ray Bradbury's methodology and intent through his writing, and the time period he was living in. Overall, many authors were enamored by technological advancement, and even feared it. Here's a more in depth look into that idea! Enjoy!

Ray Bradbury.jpg
Ray Bradbury Sound of Thunder 2.jpg
1984.jpg
Brave New World.jpg

​

Analysis of speculative fiction: Ray Bradbury

By: Ryan Lafield

 

The keyboard that I sit here pecking away at controls my emotions, my tone, my purpose – the supreme tool of life. I ponder the future and what it will look like. Today, my inferences would likely involve an existence surrounded by what we, as humans, consider necessary innovation. Consider, however, that many of these ideas represent dependency, not between people, but on technology. The glow of computer screens and hum of machines that accomplish what we cannot seem to excite the masses.

 

From my own perspective, there is appeal in the vision of a robot cleaning and cooking for my household. I’ll also proudly proclaim my anticipation for flying cars. Many years ago, the prediction was that they would already be here, jetting around like fireflies in the sky. Take it a step further and explore the wish list of every science fiction fan – the time machine. In practically every list of icebreaker questions, resides the infamous, “if you had a time machine, where would you go and why?” Admittedly, these musings do not cause much reservation to me. For others – many great minds of the past – lies trepidation. A true concern.

 

Famed author, Ray Bradbury, through a myriad of novels and short stories, has represented the group of reluctancy. Through his work, his purpose is an awareness of fearful uncertainty about our future world. There is an obvious disdain, and caution, for desired technological phenomena. Mr. Bradbury is a genius at combining sunshine pumping with a darkness of eagerness to support his point. The creativity and entertainment value in his stories highlight a warning sign for our species yet inspire change at the same time.

 

One of the most direct methods of outlining a theme within a story is through the mindset and actions of the central characters. Many of Bradbury’s protagonists find themselves in a common scenario of craving technology – the intent of making life easier or more enjoyable – only to have the goals backfire. In his short story “The Marionettes, Inc.” two conversing gentlemen, trapped in wearisome marriages, discuss the benefits of cloning themselves. The objective – the ability to temporarily leave their wives at times, the clones, or “Marionettes,” duplicating the marital roles of each man.

Regardless of whether or not the reader liked the idea, the plan was an underhanded way for Bradbury to spotlight his opinion of existing problems in marriage. Technology enters as a solution to these men’s issues yet misfires on the initial plan, as eventually, the clones turn on them. Bradbury’s warning is apparent.

 

Likewise, his characters in “The Veldt” experience a similar fate after submerging into a life of dependency on household technology. A married couple and their two young children live in a home that functions solely with technological assistance. The children even receive their evening baths from robotic scrubbing. The house clearly represents Bradbury’s fear of humankind falling into an unhealthy, and inhumane, reliance. Part of the advancement of the home was an expensive playroom for the kids. The “nursery” is modified with three dimensional surrounding walls that bring to life whatever it is the children create in their minds. The parents soon recognize a significant concern, as the children’s dependence on the room had become unhealthy. Upon attempting to punish their offspring one afternoon, the kids rebel by wishing their parents dead – to which the room abides.

Clearly, Bradbury depicts the notion of society being unable to reverse its course, once in too deep. Realization mirrors reality. As an example, imagine attempting to undo the thirty-year-old internet – something many feel has become a detriment to society. Bradbury is able to parallel this concern through his own extrapolations.

 

Consider that the impact of a story can be determined by an author’s foreshadowing technique. That methodology is used in many literary pieces, not just Ray Bradbury. George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldus Huxley’s Brave New World  are both renowned novels that depict the same type of inferences about technology and our future.

 

“A Sound of Thunder,” another of Bradbury’s short stories, revolves around a high technological development, the aforementioned time machine. In the year 2055, a company offers wealthy clients the ability to hunt dinosaurs from millions of years prior. Bradbury uses foreshadowing methods throughout the story to insinuate that catastrophe is evident. The hunters are alerted to stay on a previously built path. The emphasis placed on this stipulation to the hunt is telling. As likely predicted, one of them indeed disobeys and squashes a butterfly, ultimately altering existence as the world evolves. Again, technology has led to disaster in a Bradbury tale.

 

If a few small aspects of the past were altered, could the ways of life be improved? I believe it to be the encompassing notion of many. Although the phrase “butterfly effect” was not technically coined until 1960 by meteorologist Edward Lorenz, Ray Bradbury essentially envisioned the concept eight years earlier. The discovery was that a single flap of a butterfly’s wings has the capability to affect world-wide weather in the most extreme of ways. Symbolically, Bradbury’s character Eckels stepping on a butterfly altered evolution in similar extremisms.  

 

Moving beyond time travel to a more realistic scenario, suppose during an everyday occurrence, an item is forgotten, which, in turn, compels a person to return for it. Upon that shift in schedule, said person bumps into another, and a relationship blossoms. Resulting from the serendipitous moment, the concept that an infinite number of small occurrences could have hindered other events is the viewpoint. It seems the theory has directly, and indirectly, influenced the popular cliché “everything happens for a reason.” The connection between Bradbury’s anti-technology stance and the butterfly effect expresses the fear of the direction humanity is headed. He does a magnificent job of incorporating the dangers of changing the course of evolution while hemming it all into a fun tale involving time travel and dinosaurs.

 

It is crucial to apply the societal influence of the time period that an author lives in. The manner in which people from different decades – and even centuries – view the future, is an intriguing prompt for analyzing literature. It is easy to see that the events within society during the years certain pieces are written influence future visions. “A Sound of Thunder” was written in 1952, very shortly after World War II, and the threat of ruthless dictatorship. Implied in Bradbury’s story, that particular fear exists in the setting; United States, 2055. It is presented with such intensity that, because of the destruction of one butterfly, one of the changes to reality upon the hunters’ return was that a dictator had won the presidential election, instead of the opposition who had won prior to the time-travelling journey. Bradbury includes multiple references to the election, the most notable being that the first inquiry from the men when back in the present is “who won the election?” Bradbury himself always spoke of writing about what surrounds a person.  

 

In a more uplifting example, a film such as “Back to the Future II” released in 1989, views the future (2015) with a bright, artsy, aura of creativity and technological development. The mid to late eighties began the age of computers, along with arguably the most colorful and creative fashion and décor in recent history. Wars and fear were not dwelled on during this time period, and coincidentally, the vision of the near future reflected it.

 

Lastly, consider the ideas 19th century author H.G. Wells in his book “The Time Machine.” The novel was written in 1898, and his visions of the year 802,701 predict that the human race will sink into a species void of motivation and intelligence. The idea being that humans will slowly lose intellect for reasons correlated with the behavioral patterns of humans during the time it was written. During the late 1800’s, there was apparent disappointment in the development of humanity, at least in the eyes of Wells.

             

The examples offered previously were written many years apart from one another, yet they all demonstrate the idea that present day society influences our extrapolations of the future. Is the theory that technology will eventually overtake humanity far-fetched? While some may say yes, according to many, they must be careful, as they may become complacent, allowing a  mindset that would lead it in that direction. It might be extreme to fear advancement, but rather, be cautious of it.

 

Stories have been known to come true.

bottom of page